Trader’s Guide 2.2- Active and Passive Products

Active vs Passive

When Maria was in her mid-20s, she was eager to start investing for her future. She had been reading up on personal finance and had heard about two different types of investment products: actively managed and passively managed.

Maria wasn't quite sure what the difference was between the two, so she decided to do some more research. She learned that actively managed investment products, like mutual funds, have a professional fund manager who makes decisions about which securities to buy and sell in the fund. The goal of an actively managed fund is to outperform a particular benchmark, like the S&P 500.

On the other hand, passively managed investment products, like index funds and ETFs, don't have a fund manager making individual security decisions. Instead, these funds aim to track the performance of a specific benchmark or index, such as the S&P 500.

Maria was intrigued by this difference and wanted to learn more. She decided to speak with a financial advisor to get a better understanding.

The financial advisor explained to Maria that actively managed funds often come with higher fees because there is a team of professionals researching and making decisions about the securities in the fund. These higher fees can eat into the fund's returns, which can make it harder for the fund to outperform its benchmark.

Passively managed funds, on the other hand, have lower fees because they simply track the performance of an index and don't require a team of professionals to research and make decisions about the securities in the fund.

Maria was starting to see the trade-off between the two types of funds. Actively managed funds have the potential to outperform their benchmarks, but they also come with higher fees. Passively managed funds have lower fees, but they may not outperform their benchmarks.

As she continued to research, Maria learned that the performance of actively managed funds can be difficult to predict. Some actively managed funds may outperform their benchmarks in a given year, while others may underperform.

On the other hand, the performance of passively managed funds can be more predictable because they simply track the performance of an index. If the benchmark index performs well, then the passively managed fund is likely to perform well. If the benchmark index performs poorly, then the passively managed fund is likely to perform poorly.

Maria began to see the benefits of passively managed funds, particularly for long-term investments. She decided to allocate a portion of her investment portfolio to passively managed index funds.

Over time, Maria was pleased with the performance of her index funds. She noticed that the fees were lower than some of the actively managed funds she had been considering and that the returns were in line with the performance of the benchmark index.

As Maria's portfolio grew, she started to pay more attention to the fees associated with her investments. She realized that the lower fees of passively managed funds can make a big difference over the long term.

For example, let's say Maria has a portfolio of $100,000 and earns an average annual return of 7%. If she is paying 1% in fees for her investments, she would end up with $247,000 after 20 years.

However, if Maria was paying 2% in fees for her investments, she would only end up with $210,000 after 20 years, even though the returns were the same. This shows the impact that fees can have on the overall performance of an investment portfolio.

Maria learned that the choice between actively managed and passively managed investment products is a trade-off. Actively managed funds have the potential to outperform their benchmarks, but they also come with higher fees. Passively managed funds have lower fees, but they may not outperform their benchmarks.

In the

continue

end, Maria decided that for her long-term investment strategy, the lower fees and predictable performance of passively managed index funds made them the better choice. She was comfortable with the idea that her funds may not outperform the benchmark index in any given year, as long as they were tracking the performance of the index over the long term.

As Maria continued to invest and educate herself about personal finance, she learned about other factors to consider when choosing investment products, such as the risk level and the specific benchmarks or indexes being tracked.

But the difference between actively managed and passively managed funds remained an important concept for Maria as she built her investment portfolio. She learned that the choice between the two can have a significant impact on the fees she pays and the overall performance of her investments.

Maria's experience illustrates the importance of understanding the difference between actively managed and passively managed investment products, and how that choice can affect the long-term success of an investment portfolio.